In this way, we think that Justice should not appear distant

It is true that everything arises from an administrative contract and costs and benefits must be evaluated within it. There is no option for the user, as the road, in most cases, that leads from the origin to the destination is unique and exclusive, so paying is the rule.
In this way, we think that Justice should not appear distant and much less attribute the exclusive analysis of the specific case to the administrative body. Once the abuse and misuse of purpose have been verified, with the intention to harm the consumer, it is up to the Judiciary to combat the irregularity and determine an immediate review, under penalty of becoming insensitive and subject to the administrator's excesses. In this sense, the toll system can only be understood and understood in a range of benefits and through the modal system and with minimum spacing between the implemented plazas.



are proportional and have reduced costs, here in Brazil, in many states, we have dissimilar and stratospheric values. There is a charge for everything and in some places prices above R$ , which does not seem correct, depending on the place used and its immediate benefit. What's more, the toll is always incorporated with a static radar that surprises the user and imposes a fine, because if we understand that the roads have a minimum speed of km/h, most of them fluctuate and have their own urban perimeter limits.


However, unless there is better judgment, it is wrong to remove Austria Phone Numbers List from the Judiciary, through technical data, control over the legality of the value and utility-necessity of the existing toll plaza. In simpler terms, would it be essential and viable to locate that toll at that height on a given road or would its scope be exclusively to benefit the concessionary entity?



Therefore, it would be naive to think that between the grantor and concessionaire there would be a collective spirit to be drawn. Most of the time, regulatory agencies are sensitive and favor companies that explore these activities. Within this angle, it is up to the Court to examine, firstly, the convenience and opportunity of the act, which is not discretionary, but rather linked, and provide the opportunity for the real valuation to be demanded from the user.









While in Europe and the United States tolls are proportional and have reduced costs, here in Brazil, in many states, we have dissimilar and stratospheric values. There is a charge for everything and in some places prices above R$ , which does not seem correct, depending on the place used and its immediate benefit. What's more, the toll is always incorporated with a static radar that surprises the user and imposes a fine, because if we understand that the roads have a minimum speed of km/h, most of them fluctuate and have their own urban perimeter limits.




and much less attribute the exclusive analysis of the specific case to the administrative body. Once the abuse and misuse of purpose have been verified, with the intention to harm the consumer, it is up to the Judiciary to combat the irregularity and determine an immediate review, under penalty of becoming insensitive and subject to the administrator's excesses. In this sense, the toll system can only be understood and understood in a range of benefits and through the modal system and with minimum spacing between the implemented plazas.